buzz chat, hoogwerker huren, live black sex, oralcum, free nude sex chat, chat espanol, fat tits, jamaica live cam, latin, uk sex chat, freebbw porn galleries,
|
What it ended up being, was a summary of what the political body within the IPCC wanted it to say, which was something much different.(http://www.sepp.org/ipcccont/ipcccont.html) There is increasingly intense pressure within the scientific community wife on individuals who reject the wife current thinking to conform to the wife dogma, and it leads right back to the political manipulation by the IPCC, of scientific opinion. db_cooper in January( http://161.188.204.78/DNBlog/oldmt-comments.cgi?entry_id=2725 ) brought up a good point in regards to the thoroughly discredited IPCC 'hockeystick'. He also made a good point about the similarities with the solar radiation charts. I would also like to add the long string of failures ( specifically, temperature rise overestimates) in the climate models utilized by the IPCC, and the fact that many scientists believe that these failures are directly related to the fact that CO2( less than 3% of the greenhouse gases) is given too much credit within the model, where the primary greenhouse gas (water vapour, 97%) should be given more.
|